![[BP] Bachelors project](https://www.kis.fri.uniza.sk/wp-content/themes/Divi-child/imgs/KIS-subject-default.png)
Main objectives of the course:
Lecturers from the department:
| Course information sheet | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University: University of Žilina | |||||||||||||
| Faculty: Faculty of Management Science and Informatics | |||||||||||||
| Course ID: 5Z1I1 | Course name: Bachelors project (BP) | ||||||||||||
| Form, extent and method of teaching activities: | |||||||||||||
| Number of classes per week in the form of lectures, laboratory exercises, seminars or clinical practice | Lectures: 0.0 Seminars: 0.0 Lab.exercises: 8.0 | ||||||||||||
| Methods by which the educational activity is delivered | Present form of education | ||||||||||||
| Applied educational activities and methods suitable for achieving learning outcomes | |||||||||||||
| Number of credits: 12.0 | |||||||||||||
| Study workload: 0 hours Specification of the study workload: | |||||||||||||
| Recommended term of study: 3. year, summer semester | |||||||||||||
| Study degree: 1. | |||||||||||||
| Required subsidiary courses: Prerequisites: All obligatory courses and required number of credits. Co-requisites: | |||||||||||||
| Course requirements: Continuous assessment / evaluation: Students must continually fulfill all the conditions laid down by the supervisor. During the work the student must: - analyse the problem, - create or edit the architecture of the system, - possibly create or edit a detailed specifications of the assignment, - create the documentation, - present the state of the solution continuously, - create a publication on the status of the project. Students must: - prepare and submit documentation, - present the acquired results before the supervisor and possibly the present members of the academic community, - optionally create a publication on the status of the project. Project manager assesses: - presentation, - formal aspects of presentation. - Wheather it is clear what should have been done? - How good was the presentation? - Wheather it is clear what has been done? - Wheather are clear short term goals? - How the student answered the questions. Final assessment /evaluation: The work is assesses by the supervisor and one opponent. During the state examination the commission assesses also: - the quality of the work, - deep of the analysis carried out, - use of new procedures/methods, - verification of the solutions, - the contribution of the solution for practice. The evaluation of the examination is as follows: A 93-100 points B 85-92 points C 77- 84 points D 69-76 points E 61-68 points Fx less than 61 points To enroll for an exam student must have - points. | |||||||||||||
| Course outcomes: Bachelor work. | |||||||||||||
| Course scheme: Preparation of the final work in accordance with the guidelines for this type of work. | |||||||||||||
| Literature: Is specified by the supervisor. | |||||||||||||
| Instruction language: slovak | |||||||||||||
| Notes: | |||||||||||||
| Course evaluation:: Total number of evaluated students: 78
| |||||||||||||
| A | B | C | D | E | FX | ||||||||
| 38.46 % | 25.64 % | 14.10 % | 12.82 % | 8.97 % | 0.00 % | ||||||||
| Course teachers: | |||||||||||||
| Last updated: 2022-02-09 20:42:13.880 | |||||||||||||
| The person responsible for the course: prof. Ing. Emil Kršák, PhD. | |||||||||||||
| Approved by: prof. Ing. Pavel Segeč, PhD. | |||||||||||||